Training Load – a two-sided coin!

A runner recovering after adding training load

π“π«πšπ’π§π’π§π  π‹π¨πšπ – 𝐚 𝐭𝐰𝐨-𝐬𝐒𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐜𝐨𝐒𝐧!

On one side of the coin, the reason you’re training – improving your performance, your fitness, your speed, your ability to run further for longer.

On the other, the impact of your workouts – fatigue, muscle soreness, dehydration, injury risk … the list could go on.

How can a single Training Load Score (per workout) fully model training load – both the shorter-term impacts and the longer-term improvements?

π“π‘πž π‘πžπ¬πžπšπ«πœπ‘

Research into the impacts of training has resulted in various models:
βœ… Rowbottom proposed a Stimulus, Fatigue, Recovery, Adaptation model, sometimes referred to as the supercompensation model
βœ… Banister proposed an Impulse-Response model, popularised in the TRIMP metric based on Heart Rate measurements
βœ… Allen, Coggan and McGregor adapted the Impulse-Response model for use with power, encapsulating it in the Performance Manager model.

π“π‘πž 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐫 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞π₯

The model has the following components:
1. A Training Load Score, which the model calls a Training Stress Score (TSS)
2. An Acute Training Load (ATL), modelling shorter-term impacts
3. A Chronic Training Load (CTL), modelling longer-term adaptations
4. A Training Load Balance, which the model calls a Training Stress Balance (TSB), representing the balance between ATL and CTL

The Performance Manager model uses π‘¦π‘œπ‘’π‘Ÿ Training Load Scores to calculate personal training metrics that indicate whether π‘¦π‘œπ‘’π‘Ÿ training is productive – not too much, not too little, just right for you.

And with the two different load metrics (ATL and CTL), the model includes both the shorter-term impacts and the longer-term improvements.

You may have encountered ATL and CTL already (without knowing it) – they have equivalents in other models:
πŸ”Ή ATL is known as ‘7d avg’ in Stryd’s model, and ‘fatigue’ in heartrate-based models
πŸ”Ή CTL is known as ’42d avg’ in Stryd’s model, and ‘fitness’ in heartrate-based models

𝑺𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅𝒏’𝒕 π’šπ’π’– 𝒃𝒆 π‘Ήπ’–π’π’π’Šπ’π’ˆ π’˜π’Šπ’•π’‰ π‘·π’π’˜π’†π’“?

❓ Questions?
πŸ“– Getting Started

For more information on the models, see:
πŸ”Ή Rowbottom, D.J., (2000), in Garrett, W.E., Kirkendall, D.T., (eds.). Periodization of Training. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
πŸ”Ή Calvert, T.W., Banister, E.W., Savage, M.V., Bach, T., (1976) A Systems Model of the Effects of Training on Physical Performance
πŸ”Ή Allen, H., Coggan, A. & McGregor, S. (2019) Training+Racing with a Power Meter, 3rd Edition (pp. 158-160). Boulder: Velopress.
πŸ”Ή The Science of the TrainingPeaks Performance Manager on the TrainingPeaks website

π“π¨π©π’πœ: π“π«πšπ’π§π’π§π  π‹π¨πšπ
⏩ What is Training Load?
⏩ Training Load – a two-sided coin!
⏩ Achieving a Training Load Balance
⏩ The danger of ramping up too quickly
⏩ Race-specific training